“No-kill” groups also avoid accountability by shuttling animals between “foster homes,” sometimes for years. This siphons public support away from the facilities that help the vast majority of unwanted animals in need. Yet in their fundraising materials and public statements, many “no-kill” advocates and facilities condemn shelters whose workers must carry out the heartbreaking, inescapable work that “no-kill” shelters refuse to do. Ironically, many “no-kill” shelters refer unwanted animals to high-intake, open-admission shelters-which take in all animals and must therefore euthanize some to make room for the steady stream of newcomers. Michael Mountain, Founder and Past President Best Friends Animal Sanctuary
![no kill shelter near me no kill shelter near me](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/41/26/12/41261267e05170a475c56a82892be393.jpg)
“We have at least 500 calls per week asking us to take this dog or cat. Facilities that adhere to these policies opt not to involve themselves in euthanasia by turning away animals in need, shipping animals out of state to unknown and often untraceable destinations, or warehousing animals in cages indefinitely. They simply leave them to die elsewhere-often miserably. “No-kill” policies don’t prevent animals from dying. Greg Bloomfield, Past Executive Director Toledo Area Humane Society A Deceptive Shell Game What happened to those 608 cats last year?” “The limited intake philosophy is not the solution for the problem because you’re not addressing all the animals in need. Under intense pressure from “no-kill” extremists to increase “live-release” rates and reduce euthanasia at all costs, many shelters are turning their backs on the very animals who need them most. See why “no-kill” can mean no help for the neediest cats and dogs:īecause more than 6 million dogs and cats flood animal shelters every year, “no-kill” facilities are perpetually full, with weeks- or months-long waiting lists, “managed admissions,” and appointment-based systems. Keeping animals out of shelters may keep “no-kill” shelters’ euthanasia rates low and make for effective fundraising, but it spells disaster for animals. ‘Sorry-We’re Full’Ī first-of-its-kind video reveals how, every day, animals like this abandoned dog are turned away by shelters boasting of “no-kill” policies. If the shelter had had an open-door policy-or even if it had simply transported her to a local socially conscious open-admission shelter-this dog would have been spared terror, pain, suffering, and perhaps even death. The young dog was finally euthanized because of the extent of her pain and injuries. A shelter worker found the dog struggling to stand, apparently having sustained a broken back and a crushed pelvis. It wasn’t long before she was struck by a car. Terrified and desperate, the dog ran onto a nearby highway. The man was seen throwing a mixed-breed dog-frightened and malnourished, with every rib visible-from his vehicle before speeding off into the dark.
![no kill shelter near me no kill shelter near me](https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/collegiatetimes.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/2/e2/2e249836-2a94-11e7-9eee-97837e02457d/5900bb60db935.image.jpg)
He didn’t know anyone was watching, but he apparently did know that the limited-admission shelter often refused entry to animals in need.
![no kill shelter near me no kill shelter near me](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/77/1f/fd/771ffd414627e3c300591f25ebbdefde.jpg)
Right before dawn one morning, a man drove up to a “no-kill” animal shelter in Virginia.